Twenty-three customer interviews and no decision is a very common place to be. The interviews were not the problem. The question was.
Would you use it is a question people answer to be kind. Without a grading rule, the twenty-fourth interview cannot settle what the first twenty-three could not.
Re-read your notes and count only the interviewees who described money or time they already spend on this problem, a trigger that would make them act, the authority to pay, and a response to a price. That number, rather than the interview count, is your evidence.
You did what everyone told you to do. You talked to customers. The spreadsheet is full of green highlights: they dislike the workarounds, they would use something better.
An adviser suggested more discovery. You have three competing feature ideas and no clearer sense of whether to build than you had before the first call.
I need more interviews, or better questions.
More of the same question produces more of the same answer. The notes are not wrong; they are unsorted. Everyone said they would use it, and nobody was asked what they would stop paying for to have it.
Having done the step that was supposed to answer the question, and still not knowing, feels like a personal failure. It is a sorting job. The evidence is in the notes, and what is missing is the grade against a buying decision.
Which interviewees could become paying customers: who has current spend, a trigger, the authority to buy, and a response to a price?
The GTM Right question this belongs to
Can a stranger become a paying customer?
Secondary: Is the problem publicly visible and urgent?
Add four columns to the spreadsheet: what they spend on this problem today in money or time, what event would make them act, whether they could approve a purchase, and what they said when a price was mentioned. Leave a column blank where the notes have no answer.
Count the rows where the first column has a real answer. That number is your evidence. Everything else was politeness or interest, which is worth understanding and settles nothing.
For the next five conversations, bring a specific offer and a price, and ask about a real decision in their organisation, including what would stop it.
Write down, before those calls, what evidence would justify the next build step. A target number of conversations cannot do that.
Would you use it is a question people answer to be kind.
In this situation the free Stage 1 check reads the public market evidence for the problem: whether strangers who were never interviewed describe it, unprompted, as real, visible and urgent. It is a check on whether the pain in your notes exists outside the people who were kind enough to talk to you.
True Validation tests public market evidence only: whether the problem is real, visible and urgent. It does not prove buyer budget, willingness to pay, offer fit, acquisition economics or full commercial viability.
The buyer interview questions on this site, and the Buyer + Offer stage, are built around evidence that discriminates: current spend, purchase triggers, authority and a response to a paid offer. Applied to existing notes, they separate politeness from proof and tell you when you have enough to proceed.
Stages 2 to 6 test the later commercial assumptions: Buyer Precision, Buyer + Offer, Revenue Funnel, Market + Funnel, Commercial Decision. They do not change the fact that Stage 1 is market validation only.
Nothing here replaces the next five conversations, and nothing here can tell you what the interviewees will say to a price. It can only make sure that when they answer, you know what the answer counts as.
Run the free Stage 1 checkStage 1 of 6. Free. No account required. Usually under 90 seconds.
Related
Buyer interview questions
Questions that surface past behaviour, workarounds, consequences, buying roles and a real next action.
Customer validation for startups
From discovery to buyer behaviour, economic commitment and repeatable buying evidence.
Startup traction diagnosis
What stalled growth is telling you, and the four-grade rubric for reading buyer evidence.
All 25 founder decisions · Forward this to: The cofounder or mentor who told you to talk to customers.
This page was written from an illustrative founder story, "The interviews that filled a spreadsheet and left the decision empty". The characters and events in it are invented; it is not a customer testimonial or an account of a verified GTM Right result.