After customer discovery

You did the customer interviews and still cannot decide. Grade the notes you already have.

Twenty-three customer interviews and no decision is a very common place to be. The interviews were not the problem. The question was.

Would you use it is a question people answer to be kind. Without a grading rule, the twenty-fourth interview cannot settle what the first twenty-three could not.

Re-read your notes and count only the interviewees who described money or time they already spend on this problem, a trigger that would make them act, the authority to pay, and a response to a price. That number, rather than the interview count, is your evidence.

What just happened

You did what everyone told you to do. You talked to customers. The spreadsheet is full of green highlights: they dislike the workarounds, they would use something better.

An adviser suggested more discovery. You have three competing feature ideas and no clearer sense of whether to build than you had before the first call.

What you are probably about to do

I need more interviews, or better questions.
  • Book another five calls.
  • Buy an interview question template.
  • Survey the same people.
  • Hire someone who does research for a living.

Why that does not settle it

More of the same question produces more of the same answer. The notes are not wrong; they are unsorted. Everyone said they would use it, and nobody was asked what they would stop paying for to have it.

Having done the step that was supposed to answer the question, and still not knowing, feels like a personal failure. It is a sorting job. The evidence is in the notes, and what is missing is the grade against a buying decision.

The question underneath

Which interviewees could become paying customers: who has current spend, a trigger, the authority to buy, and a response to a price?

The GTM Right question this belongs to

Can a stranger become a paying customer?

Secondary: Is the problem publicly visible and urgent?

Today, with the notes you already have

  1. 01

    Add four columns to the spreadsheet: what they spend on this problem today in money or time, what event would make them act, whether they could approve a purchase, and what they said when a price was mentioned. Leave a column blank where the notes have no answer.

  2. 02

    Count the rows where the first column has a real answer. That number is your evidence. Everything else was politeness or interest, which is worth understanding and settles nothing.

  3. 03

    For the next five conversations, bring a specific offer and a price, and ask about a real decision in their organisation, including what would stop it.

  4. 04

    Write down, before those calls, what evidence would justify the next build step. A target number of conversations cannot do that.

Would you use it is a question people answer to be kind.

Where GTM Right fits, and where it stops

In this situation the free Stage 1 check reads the public market evidence for the problem: whether strangers who were never interviewed describe it, unprompted, as real, visible and urgent. It is a check on whether the pain in your notes exists outside the people who were kind enough to talk to you.

True Validation tests public market evidence only: whether the problem is real, visible and urgent. It does not prove buyer budget, willingness to pay, offer fit, acquisition economics or full commercial viability.

The buyer interview questions on this site, and the Buyer + Offer stage, are built around evidence that discriminates: current spend, purchase triggers, authority and a response to a paid offer. Applied to existing notes, they separate politeness from proof and tell you when you have enough to proceed.

Stages 2 to 6 test the later commercial assumptions: Buyer Precision, Buyer + Offer, Revenue Funnel, Market + Funnel, Commercial Decision. They do not change the fact that Stage 1 is market validation only.

Nothing here replaces the next five conversations, and nothing here can tell you what the interviewees will say to a price. It can only make sure that when they answer, you know what the answer counts as.

Run the free Stage 1 check

Stage 1 of 6. Free. No account required. Usually under 90 seconds.

Questions founders ask in this situation

I did customer interviews and still don't know whether to build. What next?
Grade the notes you have before you book more calls. Sort every interviewee by current spend on the problem, a trigger to act, authority to buy and their response to a price. The small number that pass all four is your evidence. The next conversations should ask for a decision at a price, rather than for an opinion.
How many customer interviews are enough?
Enough is the point at which the next interview stops changing your answer, and that depends on the question you ask rather than the count. Five conversations that each end with a response to a priced offer tell you more than fifty that end with a compliment.
How do I tell polite interest from real demand in interviews?
Demand leaves a trail of cost. Someone with real demand has already spent money or time on the problem, can name what would make them act, can say who would approve the purchase, and reacts to a price with a question rather than a smile. Interest sounds warm and has no trail.
Which customer interview answers actually count as evidence?
Answers about the past and about cost: the last time the problem happened, what it cost them, what they did about it, who else was involved, and what they currently pay for the workaround. Answers about a hypothetical future, including whether they would use your product, are not evidence of anything except goodwill.
What questions should I ask to find out if someone would pay?
Ask what they pay now, in money or time, for the problem or its workaround. Ask what would have to happen for them to change. Ask who would approve the purchase. Then state a price and ask for a dated next step. The reaction to the last question is the only direct evidence about payment an interview can produce.
How do I turn interview notes into a decision?
Decide, before you re-read them, what evidence would justify building: for example, a set number of interviewees with current spend, a trigger and authority, and at least a few who responded to a price with a next step. Then count. If the count is there, build the smallest thing that tests the next assumption. If it is not, the notes have told you what the next five conversations must ask.

Related

All 25 founder decisions · Forward this to: The cofounder or mentor who told you to talk to customers.

This page was written from an illustrative founder story, "The interviews that filled a spreadsheet and left the decision empty". The characters and events in it are invented; it is not a customer testimonial or an account of a verified GTM Right result.